EU KI-Verordnung — Vollständig strukturiert

108 Pflichten. Jede Frist. Jede Sanktion.

Die EU KI-Verordnung als verwertbare Daten — filterbar, durchsuchbar und maschinenlesbar. Kostenlos und offen.

0
Pflichten
€35M
Max. Bußgeld
Aug 2, 2026
Hauptfrist
0
Risikostufen
Projekt prüfen →
Durchsetzungszeitplan

Was gilt, was kommt als Nächstes

13 Jun 2024
EU AI Act adopted by European Parliament and Council
Begin processing regulation content. Start building compliance framework.
Abgeschlossen
12 Jul 2024
Published in Official Journal of the European Union
Official text available. Finalize regulatory parsing.
Abgeschlossen
1 Aug 2024
Entry into force (20 days after publication)
Regulation is law. Countdown timers start for all phases.
Abgeschlossen
2 Feb 2025
Phase 1: Prohibited practices (Art. 5) and AI literacy (Art. 4) apply
Prohibited practices screening and AI literacy modules must be live. Article 5 checklist and training templates must be available.
Abgeschlossen
2 Feb 2025
Commission published Guidelines on Prohibited AI Practices and AI System Definition
Update prohibited practices screening logic and definition matching based on official guidelines.
Abgeschlossen
Pflichten-Explorer

108 Anforderungen, filterbar

Klicken Sie auf eine Zeile, um vollständige Details, Nachweisanforderungen und Automatisierungsansatz anzuzeigen.

Alle RollenAnbieterBetreiberVerbotenHochGPAIBegrenztMinimalKritischHohe Schwere
20 Pflichten entsprechen
Article 26(1)-(5)
Deployer: Use High-Risk AI Per Instructions and Monitor
Deployerhigh
◑
Beschreibung

Use system per instructions, assign human oversight, ensure input data quality, monitor operations, keep logs 6+ months.

Was zu tun ist
  • Implement provider instructions
  • Assign named human oversight persons
  • Verify input data quality
  • Active monitoring
  • Log retention min 6 months
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT use high-risk AI contrary to provider's instructions
  • Do NOT skip monitoring of AI system outputs and performance
Erforderliche Nachweise

Implementation evidence, oversight assignments, monitoring logs, log retention records

Frist

2026-08-02

Article 26(10) / Article 21
Cooperate with Regulatory Authorities
Beideall
◑
Beschreibung

Provide information, documentation, and access to AI systems upon request from competent authorities.

Was zu tun ist
  • Designate regulatory contact person
  • Maintain accessible compliance documentation
  • Respond promptly and completely to requests
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT obstruct regulatory authority inspections or information requests
  • Do NOT destroy evidence relevant to compliance investigations
Erforderliche Nachweise

Designated contact details, documentation access procedures

Frist

2026-08-02

Article 5(1)(e)
Prohibited: Untargeted Facial Image Scraping
Beideunacceptable
◑
Beschreibung

Verify no AI system creates or expands facial recognition databases through untargeted scraping from internet or CCTV.

Was zu tun ist
  • Check if any AI component scrapes facial images
  • Verify face databases are not built from untargeted web/CCTV scraping
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT scrape facial images from the internet or CCTV without targeted lawful basis
  • Do NOT build or expand facial recognition databases through mass collection
Erforderliche Nachweise

Facial data sourcing audit

Frist

2025-02-02

Sanktion

€35M / 7% turnover

Article 12
Implement Automatic Event Logging
Providerhigh
✓
Beschreibung

High-risk AI must automatically record events (logs) for traceability: periods of use, input references, outputs, human interventions.

Was zu tun ist
  • Design logging from architecture phase
  • Log: timestamps, inputs, outputs, human oversight actions, errors
  • Integrity protection on logs
  • Provide deployer guidance on log access
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT deploy high-risk AI without automatic event logging enabled
  • Do NOT log only errors — log all events specified by provider
Erforderliche Nachweise

Architecture docs showing logging, sample logs, retention policy, integrity mechanism

Frist

2026-08-02

Article 5(1)(f)
Prohibited: Workplace/Education Emotion Recognition
Beideunacceptable
✓
Beschreibung

Verify no AI system infers emotions of persons in workplace or educational settings (except for medical or safety reasons).

Was zu tun ist
  • Identify any emotion recognition AI
  • Verify it is NOT used in workplace or education context
  • If medical/safety exception claimed, document justification
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT use emotion recognition AI in workplace or educational settings
  • Do NOT infer employee mood, stress, or engagement via facial/voice analysis (exception: medical/safety)
Erforderliche Nachweise

Emotion recognition context audit

Frist

2025-02-02

Sanktion

€35M / 7% turnover

Article 5(1)(g)
Prohibited: Sensitive Biometric Categorization
Beideunacceptable
◑
Beschreibung

Verify no AI system categorizes persons based on biometric data to infer sensitive characteristics (race, political opinions, religion, sexual orientation).

Was zu tun ist
  • Check if any AI uses biometric data to infer race, religion, political views, or sexual orientation
  • Document absence of such functionality
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT use biometric data to categorize individuals by race, religion, political opinion, or sexual orientation
  • Do NOT infer sensitive attributes from biometric inputs
Erforderliche Nachweise

Biometric categorization screening

Frist

2025-02-02

Sanktion

€35M / 7% turnover

Article 4
Ensure AI Literacy of Staff
Beideunacceptablehighlimitedminimalgpai
◑
Beschreibung

Every company that uses or builds AI must train their staff so they understand AI risks and responsible use. Training must be proportionate to role and risk level.

Was zu tun ist
  • Conduct skills gap assessment
  • Develop role-based AI literacy training
  • Document training completion
  • Annual refresh cycle
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT allow staff to use AI systems without any training
  • Do NOT treat AI literacy as a one-time event — it requires annual refresh
  • Do NOT apply same training level to all roles — tailor to responsibility
Erforderliche Nachweise

Training records, curriculum, policy document, completion certificates

Frist

2025-02-02

Sanktion

€15M / 3% turnover

✓ Scanner checks for: AI-LITERACY.md or ai-training-policy.* files in project root. Verifies document contains required sections (scope, training levels, schedule, records). Template auto-generates if missing.
Article 5
Do Not Deploy Prohibited AI Systems
Beideunacceptable
◑
Beschreibung

Screen all AI systems against Article 5 prohibited practices. Eight categories of banned AI uses.

Was zu tun ist
  • Audit all AI systems against Art. 5 list
  • Document screening results
  • Establish pre-deployment screening process
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT deploy any AI system matching prohibited categories without legal review
  • Do NOT assume third-party tools are automatically compliant with Art. 5
Erforderliche Nachweise

AI inventory with Art. 5 screening results per system

Frist

2025-02-02

Sanktion

€35M / 7% turnover (HIGHEST tier)

✓ Scanner performs static analysis for prohibited practice patterns: import statements for emotion detection SDKs, facial recognition APIs, social scoring libraries. Flags packages matching prohibited use signatures in dependency tree.
Article 5(1)(a)
Prohibited: Subliminal/Manipulative AI Techniques
Beideunacceptable
◑
Beschreibung

Verify no AI system uses subliminal, manipulative, or deceptive techniques to distort behavior beyond a person's consciousness, causing significant harm.

Was zu tun ist
  • For each AI system: assess whether it could manipulate user behavior through deceptive patterns, dark patterns, or subliminal techniques
  • Document assessment rationale
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT use dark patterns, persuasion profiling, or behavioral nudging that bypasses user awareness
  • Do NOT deploy recommendation systems that materially distort behavior causing significant harm
Erforderliche Nachweise

Per-system manipulation risk assessment document

Frist

2025-02-02

Sanktion

€35M / 7% turnover

Article 5(1)(b)
Prohibited: Exploitation of Vulnerable Groups
Beideunacceptable
◑
Beschreibung

Verify no AI system exploits vulnerabilities of specific groups (age, disability, social/economic situation) to distort behavior causing significant harm.

Was zu tun ist
  • Identify if AI targets vulnerable populations (children, elderly, disabled, economically disadvantaged)
  • Assess exploitation risk
  • Document findings
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT target elderly, disabled, or economically vulnerable users with manipulative AI features
  • Do NOT exploit cognitive limitations of specific user groups
Erforderliche Nachweise

Vulnerability exploitation risk assessment per system

Frist

2025-02-02

Sanktion

€35M / 7% turnover

Article 5(1)(c)
Prohibited: Social Scoring Systems
Beideunacceptable
◑
Beschreibung

Verify no AI system evaluates or classifies persons based on social behavior or personal characteristics leading to detrimental treatment unrelated to the original context.

Was zu tun ist
  • Check if any AI system scores individuals based on social behavior
  • Verify scores are not used to deny services/rights in unrelated contexts
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT aggregate personal behavior scores across unrelated contexts
  • Do NOT restrict access to services based on AI-scored social behavior
Erforderliche Nachweise

Social scoring screening assessment

Frist

2025-02-02

Sanktion

€35M / 7% turnover

Article 5(1)(d)
Prohibited: Criminal Risk Profiling
Beideunacceptable
◑
Beschreibung

Verify no AI system assesses criminal risk of individuals based solely on profiling or personality traits (without concrete behavioral facts).

Was zu tun ist
  • Check if any AI predicts criminal behavior from personal traits alone
  • Ensure law enforcement AI uses objective factual indicators, not profiling
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT use AI to predict criminal risk based solely on demographics or personality traits
  • Do NOT profile individuals without objective verifiable fact basis
Erforderliche Nachweise

Criminal profiling screening assessment

Frist

2025-02-02

Sanktion

€35M / 7% turnover

Article 9
Establish Risk Management System
Providerhigh
◑
Beschreibung

Continuous risk management system throughout the high-risk AI lifecycle covering identification, evaluation, mitigation, and testing of risks.

Was zu tun ist
  • Create documented RMS
  • Identify and analyze known/foreseeable risks
  • Adopt mitigation measures
  • Test system
  • Review and update regularly
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT operate high-risk AI without a documented risk management system
  • Do NOT treat risk management as a one-time assessment — it must be continuous
Erforderliche Nachweise

RMS plan, risk register, mitigation log, testing reports

Frist

2026-08-02

Sanktion

€15M / 3% turnover

✓ Scanner checks for RISK-MANAGEMENT.md or risk-assessment.* documents. Verifies structure includes: identified risks, misuse scenarios, mitigation measures, test results. Auto-generates template with required sections.
Article 9(2)
RMS: Identify and Analyze Known Risks
Providerhigh
◑
Beschreibung

Identify and analyze risks to health, safety, and fundamental rights that are known or reasonably foreseeable when the system is used as intended.

Was zu tun ist
  • Systematic risk identification workshop
  • Document each risk with likelihood and severity
  • Consider risks to different user groups including vulnerable persons
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT ignore known risks documented by provider or reported by users
  • Do NOT omit foreseeable misuse scenarios from risk analysis
Erforderliche Nachweise

Risk register with identified risks, likelihood, severity, affected groups

Frist

2026-08-02

Article 9(2)(b)
RMS: Evaluate Risks from Misuse
Providerhigh
◑
Beschreibung

Estimate and evaluate risks not only from intended use but also from reasonably foreseeable misuse of the high-risk AI system.

Was zu tun ist
  • Brainstorm foreseeable misuse scenarios
  • Assess risks from each misuse scenario
  • Document evaluation and residual risk
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT assume users will only use the system as intended
  • Do NOT skip misuse scenario testing
Erforderliche Nachweise

Misuse risk assessment document, residual risk acceptance rationale

Frist

2026-08-02

Article 9(6)-(8)
RMS: Test System Before Market Placement
Providerhigh
◑
Beschreibung

Test the high-risk AI system to identify appropriate risk management measures. Testing must be against defined metrics prior to market placement.

Was zu tun ist
  • Define test plan with metrics
  • Execute tests including real-world conditions where appropriate (Art. 60)
  • Document test results against acceptance criteria
  • Test prior to market AND throughout lifecycle
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT place high-risk AI on market without testing against defined metrics
  • Do NOT use production data for testing without proper safeguards
Erforderliche Nachweise

Test plan, test results, acceptance criteria, test logs signed by responsible person

Frist

2026-08-02

Article 10
Ensure Training Data Quality and Governance
Providerhigh
◑
Beschreibung

Training, validation, and testing datasets must meet quality criteria: relevant, representative, free of errors, complete. Bias detection required.

Was zu tun ist
  • Implement data governance practices
  • Document data sources
  • Assess for bias
  • Address special category data under GDPR
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT train AI on biased, incomplete, or unrepresentative datasets
  • Do NOT skip data quality assessment before training
Erforderliche Nachweise

Data governance policy, data quality reports, bias analysis, GDPR documentation

Frist

2026-08-02

Article 10(2)(f)
Data Governance: Bias Detection and Mitigation
Providerhigh
✓
Beschreibung

Examine training data specifically for possible biases that could lead to discrimination, especially regarding protected characteristics.

Was zu tun ist
  • Run statistical bias analysis on training data
  • Test for representation gaps across gender, age, ethnicity, disability
  • Implement bias mitigation (resampling, reweighting, debiasing)
  • Document findings and actions
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT deploy AI systems without bias testing across protected characteristics
  • Do NOT ignore disparate impact in model outputs
Erforderliche Nachweise

Bias analysis report, mitigation actions log, before/after fairness metrics

Frist

2026-08-02

Article 10(2)(a)-(e)
Data Governance: Document Data Sources and Processing
Providerhigh
◑
Beschreibung

Document all data collection, labeling, storage, and processing choices. Include data source descriptions and representativeness rationale.

Was zu tun ist
  • Create data sheet / data card for each training dataset
  • Document collection methodology, labeling process, storage, and preprocessing
  • Assess and document representativeness
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT use training data without documenting provenance and processing steps
  • Do NOT omit data source limitations from documentation
Erforderliche Nachweise

Data sheets/data cards, data processing records, representativeness assessment

Frist

2026-08-02

Article 4
AI Literacy: Maintain Training Records
Beideall
✓
Beschreibung

Keep documented records of who was trained, when, on what topics, and their assessment results. Records must be available for auditors.

Was zu tun ist
  • Create training register with: employee name, role, training date, topics, score
  • Store records securely for audit
  • Update when new staff join or roles change
Was NICHT zu tun ist
  • Do NOT destroy or fail to maintain training completion records
  • Do NOT accept unverified self-attestation as training evidence
Erforderliche Nachweise

Training register (spreadsheet or system), individual completion records

Frist

2025-02-02

Sanktion

€15M / 3% turnover

Sanktionsstruktur

Drei Stufen der Durchsetzung

Der höhere Betrag gilt — Festbetrag oder Prozentsatz des weltweiten Jahresumsatzes.

Stufe 3 — Sonstige Pflichten
€7.5M
oder 1 % des Umsatzes
Lieferung falscher, unvollständiger oder irreführender Informationen an benannte Stellen oder nationale Behörden.
Art. 50–51 Verstöße. Niedrigere Obergrenzen für KMU (Art. 99(5)).
Stufe 2 — Hochrisiko-Verstöße
€15M
oder 3 % des Umsatzes
Nichteinhaltung der Anforderungen für Hochrisiko-KI-Systeme, GPAI-Pflichten oder Transparenzregeln.
Häufigste Sanktionsstufe für Betreiber.
Stufe 1 — Verbotene Praktiken
€35M
oder 7 % des Umsatzes
Einsatz verbotener KI: Social Scoring, Ausnutzung von Schwachstellen, nicht autorisierte biometrische Echtzeit-Identifizierung.
Gleiche Höhe wie die maximalen DSGVO-Sanktionen.
Schlüsseldefinitionen

Begriffe, die zählen

AI SystemArt. 3(1)
Ein maschinenbasiertes System, das mit unterschiedlichen Graden an Autonomie betrieben wird, Anpassungsfähigkeit zeigen kann und ableitet, wie es Ausgaben wie Vorhersagen, Inhalte, Empfehlungen oder Entscheidungen erzeugt.
ProviderArt. 3(3)
Eine natürliche oder juristische Person, die ein KI-System oder ein KI-Modell für allgemeine Zwecke entwickelt oder entwickeln lässt und es unter eigenem Namen oder eigener Marke auf den Markt bringt.
DeployerArt. 3(4)
Eine natürliche oder juristische Person, die ein KI-System in eigener Verantwortung einsetzt, außer bei persönlicher nichtberuflicher Tätigkeit.
High Risk AI SystemArt. 6
KI-System, das als Sicherheitskomponente eines unter Anhang-I-Rechtsvorschriften fallenden Produkts vorgesehen ist oder unter die Kategorien des Anhangs III fällt (Biometrie, kritische Infrastruktur usw.).
General Purpose AIArt. 3(63)
Ein KI-Modell, das mit großen Datenmengen mittels Selbstüberwachung in großem Maßstab trainiert wird und in der Lage ist, eine Vielzahl verschiedener Aufgaben zu erfüllen.
Serious IncidentArt. 3(49)
Ein Vorfall, der direkt oder indirekt zu Tod, ernsthaftem Gesundheitsschaden, schwerwiegenden Störungen kritischer Infrastrukturen oder ernsthaftem Umweltschaden führt.
Placing On The MarketArt. 3(9)
Die erstmalige Bereitstellung eines KI-Systems auf dem Unionsmarkt, ob gegen Entgelt oder unentgeltlich.
Post Market MonitoringArt. 72
Alle Tätigkeiten, die Anbieter durchführen, um Erfahrungen aus dem Einsatz von Hochrisiko-KI-Systemen proaktiv zu sammeln und zu überprüfen.

Kennen Sie Ihre Pflichten. Handeln Sie jetzt.

Führen Sie in 30 Sekunden eine kostenlose Compliance-Prüfung Ihrer KI-Tools durch.

Projekt prüfen →
$ npx complior
Copied!